![]() APM tools allow developers to check various health benchmarks of an application once it has been deployed and made available to the users. So, without further ado, let’s dive right in! What is an APM?ĪPM stands for Application Performance Monitoring and is a software solution for enhancing observability through an application’s performance. Not all platforms are the same, and each caters to its own set of target customers. Please feel free to navigate our guide using these links.īefore we compare the three platforms against one another, it is essential to establish an understanding of their backgrounds. We have tried our best to provide you with the most critical and crucial bits of information about these three providers. To help you in your hunt, we have compared three popular monitoring platforms in this article-Splunk, Dynatrace, and Scout. Therefore you need to choose the perfect monitoring solution that gives you complete visibility over your application’s aspects. There are so many things that can go wrong at the same time. These factors, when put together, contribute to the overall growth of a product. At the same time, the term has evolved from tracking only the performance of an application to monitoring the infrastructure, user experience, latency, and much more. Main downsides are pricing (this can be a harder sell to execs with purchasing power) and there is a higher learning curve to Dynatrace as there isn’t a really simple way to present all the information Dynatrace can provide.In today’s times, Application Performance Monitoring has grown to become a necessity for most software organizations. Plus the agent captures individual process metrics and correlates it to other entities that really represent the flow of information through your services. ![]() Other tools may have an edge over Dynatrace, but Dynatrace to me wins out because ingested data is available for multiple uses. Grail is pretty good with that as well, being a proprietary technology it’ll be more expensive than ES but as it’s built into the platform you’ll get a lot more information connected to what you ingest. The next 2-3 years should be interesting in this space for sure.ĮS is great for storage and indexing. I’m just waiting to see if they to ramp up their capabilities and offer hybrid solutions. I could be wrong, but that’s what I found researching their stock.Īnother concern I have in general is that the big cloud providers have some Observability capabilities. IfĪ concern I have with Elastic is they’ve run a $240+ million deficit for the past several years. I would love to be able to do a true side by side comparison from the Observability perspective, especially with Grail, but know that current management will never let that happen. I’m learning Elastic and finding weaknesses compared to Dynatrace from an APM perspective and RUM. Dynatrace is a great tool for Observability and super easy to administer (update, rollout, etc.). Our org has both and is leaning toward Elastic mainly because another area outside of IT is paying for it. It’s challenging to determine total cost when it comes to that. ![]() In addition to their other costs, Grails adds on ingest, storage and retrieval. ![]() I had one of their lead engineers describe how Grail works and sounds great. Almost all new features are in their SaaS offering which could be a show stopper for some, but that is also where Grail is, and will only ever be. At their recent conference the CTO specifically said that they will disrupt SIEM, for which Elastic has a strong base. Yes, it does and I think that’s part of the reason they developed Grail - to remove Elastic from the product (and any money they may be paying for it, since they starting being a competitor). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |